17
Jan 11

Critics of city’s past spending should speak in specifics

Rob Granatstein with The Sun makes the same point that lots of people made this past week — that the 2011 budget is nothing, and the real test comes in 2012 — but puts a bit of a conservative spin on it:

By 2014, Toronto won’t have any wiggle room to borrow any more, at its current pace. Someone has to get a handle on how this city spends.

So, starting the day after the 2011 budget is passed, work on 2012 begins.

Who knows what the 2011 surplus will be? But it’s hard to believe Ford will have $346 million in found money to play with.

Again, this budget is not truly Rob Ford’s. The 2012 budget will be his and a major test of our new mayor.

The interesting days are far from over.

via Mayor’s fight still to come: Granatstein | Rob Granatstein | Columnists | Comment | Toronto Sun.

“Someone has to get a handle on how the city spends” is the same kind of simplistic bullshit we were fed throughout the election. Honestly, I think it’s time to start demanding that people who grouse about city spending and the increases over the past seven years actually speak in specifics. Name the departments that should be cut and the services that should be reduced. It’s become increasingly clear this past week that there are not easily accessible gravy deposits at City Hall.

Earlier in his editorial, Granatstein writes that Ford “demanded the city stop going cap-in-hand to the province and the feds.” I agree with him that this was not the year for city council to be asking for increased funds from senior governments, but to simply gloss over the issue of intergovernmental relations — the dismissive ‘cap-in-hand’ phrase comes up way too often in the media — is a mistake. One of the critical roles the Mayor of Toronto must play is as an advocate for this city with the provincial and federal governments.


14
Jan 11

TTC chair Stintz: “Reconsidering these route changes”

TTC Chair Karen Stintz has released a letter addressed to “My Fellow TTC Customers” dealing with the proposed service cuts in the 2011 operating budget. She released this letter via Google Docs, presumably because no one can figure out how to upload things to the TTC website.

She says:

There are certain routes realignments which have special circumstances attached to them which yourselves and Councillors have made me and the Commission aware of. We are together reconsidering those route changes. Information sessions are being held across Toronto to explain the changes and review the options that will be available to riders.

Once again, the story of the week is that everything is rushed and no one making decisions seemingly has any idea what is really going on.

See also: This week’s Glad Hand from Torontoist.


14
Jan 11

Cut gravy, not programs

The National Post’s Natalie Alcoba must have brought a tape recorder to today’s budget meeting, because she’s got a great transcript of Doug Ford’s rant, aimed squarely at left-leaning councillors:

And for my colleagues to get up and do their political grandstanding, as I said, when they were in charge for the last seven years wasting money day in and day out and putting … in debt, and paying $446-million on interest, that we could be reallocating some of that to the police, in support of the police, I find appalling. And it’s been going on all week. Another colleague was comparing the librarians, that they should be at the same level as the police. That’s the mindset that we have here. Spend, spend, spend. Tax, tax, tax. Zero accountability. We’re in the position that because of the spending that has happened in the last seven years…

via ‘There is a procedure for being offended’: Councillors spar in committee meeting | Posted Toronto | National Post.

Aw, it’s so hard to be a law-and-order politician and a government shrinker when people won’t stop whining about their libraries.

You promised to cut gravy, not programs, councillor. People are just trying to hold you to your word.


14
Jan 11

TTC points to Fall 2011 bus service improvements

Me, just the other day:

I’d argue that we should demand a list of proposed service increases that are to come into effect in September before we accept any reduction in service this winter.

via Transit Cuts Deferred to February Meeting; City operates via longhand « Ford For Toronto.

In the interest of fairness, Steve Munro has been able to got his hands on a map of the proposed Fall 2011 service improvements. Not a lot of detail as of yet, but it’s a start.


14
Jan 11

“The hand we were dealt”

Robyn Doolittle covers the proposed user fee increases in this year’s budget — none of which seem overly controversial — and closes was this quote from the deputy mayor:

Deputy mayor Doug Holyday said he’s not happy with the fee hikes, but they may be inevitable.

“We’re trying to not put additional costs on taxpayers, but it may take a year or two or three to get things under control. We’re playing the hand we were dealt.”

via User fee hikes could raise cost of fun and fidelity – thestar.com.

Very disingenuous. The hand they were dealt was a good one: surplus money. The city essentially could take one of two paths. The first would be to plow most of the surplus into reserves and debt payments, then raising fees/taxes and finding efficiencies — and making some cuts — to fill this year’s budget hole. The second would be more pragmatic: using some of the surplus to balance this year’s operating budget but still adding to reserves and debt payment. Both strategies assume a small property tax increase for 2011.

The Ford administration took the bizarre third path, freezing property taxes (which is essentially a cut), throwing the entire surplus at this year’s operating budget and then raising a bunch of user fees and cutting services to make things balance.


13
Jan 11

Sign of the times

Over at the Toronto Star’s The Goods blog, Daniel Dale points out that Rob Ford has changed the boilerplate that goes out at the bottom of all city press releases:

Toronto is Canada’s largest city and sixth largest government, and home to a diverse population of about 2.6 million people. Toronto’s government is dedicated to delivering customer service excellence, creating a transparent and accountable government, reducing the size and cost of government and building a transportation city. For information on non-emergency City services and programs, Toronto residents, businesses and visitors can dial 311, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

via The Goods.

It’s weird. One day 47% of voters put an X next to a candidate’s name and suddenly you live in a city that primarily values small government, low taxes and ensuring that city transportation plans don’t lean too heavily toward transit.


13
Jan 11

Trading transit for highways

The 407 is a toll highway owned by a private conglomerate. There are plans on the books to expand the highway. Expansion is necessary, one Oshawa resident quoted in an article by The Star’s Carola Vyhnak says, to give Oshawa “a kick start to get back on its feet.” Sure.

But okay. This is not a Toronto issue and I am nothing if not a Toronto-centric blogger. The relevant part comes as a result of the recent news from Transportation Minister Kathleen Wynne that the highway would be built in phases, with the second phase currently unfunded.

This has prompted a firestorm of protest. And this bit of craziness, from Oshawa Mayor John Henry, a steel driving man, in a letter he wrote to the premier in December:

A two-phased approach [to 407 construction] will have crippling impacts on Durham and Peterborough. Furthermore, if government expenditures are a concern, we request you consider the reallocation of the $8.15 billion that may not be used for Toronto’s LRT to extend the 407 project to 35/115 as planned.

via Oshawa Mayor John Henry’s Open Letter to Dalton McGuinty.

I’m not suggesting there’s any chance we’d see a wholesale transfer of currently committed funding for transit onto a highway project, but I did think it important to point out that there are numerous people in high-ranking places in this province who don’t see the value of transit. They care about highways.

Case in point: this comment from Conservative MPP Christine Elliott, who promises to make the 407 construction one of the biggest issues of this fall’s provincial election:

“It’s not just the people of Columbus who are affected, it’s a widespread concern,” she said. “We need the 407 for our economic growth and our ability to travel.”

via Durham residents fuming over plan to build ‘half a highway’ – thestar.com.

The vast majority of planned provincial transit money doesn’t come into effect until 2015. Keep that in mind as the provincial election rhetoric kicks up this year.


12
Jan 11

Transit Cuts Deferred to February Meeting; City operates via longhand

David Nickle with InsideToronto:

The Toronto Transit Commission has voted postpone plans to slash off-peak service on 48 bus routes across the city.
The controversial plan emerged earlier this week, as TTC staff hurried to put together operating and capital budgets for the city’s 2011 accelerated budget process.

via InsideToronto Article: TTC delays decision to cut off-peak service on some city bus routes.

What they don’t mention in the article is, as revealed in a tweet from Councillor Josh Matlow, the amendment was deferred via a handwritten note. Which leads me to wonder if they actually were using an old-style overhead projector for this meeting or if they actually scanned in the handwritten note. In either case: damn.

The deferral is welcome news, as I’m convinced these cuts were not well thought out. I’d argue that we should demand a list of proposed service increases that are to come into effect in September before we accept any reduction in service this winter.


12
Jan 11

Setting a standard for transit

Natalie Alcoba, reporting on statements from Councillor Adam Vaughan at today’s special TTC budget meeting:

[Vaughan] said people who can’t take a bus to work late at night won’t take it for the other leg of the commute.

“Next year you will have a whole new host of underperforming routes,” he said. “Part of the way to find the way around it is to take a blind leap of faith is to grow the system and not shrink the system.”

via TTC urged to reconsider cutbacks to bus services | Posted Toronto | National Post.

People can make easy rationalizations for cutting low-performing routes, and maybe some of them are justified. The problem I have is two-fold:

First, this kind of strategy defines transit as a convience rather than the vital cornerstone of city building. The city could save a lot of money on road repairs by shutting down poorly used roads, but they’d never consider that. And for good reason — because, over time, underused roads become well-used roads. Cities change and evolve and grow.

Second, depending on who you ask the cuts are either a) being done to save money or b) not cuts at all, as the resources will be shifted to other routes in September.

Councillor Gloria Lindsay Luby spins it as the former in Alcoba’s article, saying “We are in tight times. No choices are good choices. I know that.” But the official line is still that these are not cuts but rather adjustments – how can they have it both ways?


12
Jan 11

Finding money all over the place

[blackbirdpie url=”http://twitter.com/JoshColle/status/25183967284043776″]

Posting to test the WordPress plugin Blackbird Pie for embedding Tweets into posts. And also because this tweet from Councillor Josh Colle (Ward 15 – Eglinton Lawrence) is pretty great in light of yesterday’s “Let’s save money with our magic blue pen” TTC budget report.